Theias Anmeldelser 

There is absolutely no way these guys are independent.

Absolutely ignore my evidence and listen only to the parkong pirates and look at only the selective photos (even though I asked for all the camera details which would clearly have shown the truth).

A disgrace

An embarrassing organisation that purports to provide an independent arbitration service but seemingly fails to consider the evidence presented to it.

One must wonder quite what the arrangement is between the IAS and the parking companies that it mysteriously rules in favour of contrary to the evidence.

Magistrates Court is the way forward - the more that the IAS can be found fo have not acted independently or appropriately, the sooner it will be improved or abolished in favour of competent arbitrators.

Absolutely garbage organisation they are a farse useless people with no human correlation

This "service" does not work for the motorists, it works for the greedy parking operators. I appealed a very simple PCN I received, proving that the operator kept the charge away from me on purpose for a month so I could pay the higher price. The adjudicator came back with : "The Appellant should also be aware that my role as adjudicator is not to determine what may be considered procedural issues or irregularities" . I am speechless. This "service" should be banned so it does not waste the drivers' time.

A complete waste of time. Cannot be contacted by any means whatsoever unless a postal letter.
Completely biased in Parking Companies favour. I have just had my appeal turned down. It seems that if i stop on a red line at my airport i am still liable to pay even if I am having a heart attack, i have a burst tyre or my car breaks down. Probably still have to pay based on IAS decision if i died at the wheel!
Is a no star review possible?

This is no more than a scam by 'Parking Companies and Solicitor'. I had a fine from PPP (Premium Parking Solutions) TWICE! The first time I had disposed of the actual parking ticket paid for at their machine, as the letter informing me of the fine did not arrive until 10 days later.
When I parked at the same Car Park again I kept the ticket with the date, time etc. on it. A week later another fine arrived in the post.
I sent a copy of the fine to the IAS with proof of payment and still they said I had to pay the fine. Which (like an idiot) I did.
It was only after paying the fine that I started reading various reports on this organization. If you have proof you have paid legally for parking. DO NOT PAY THE FINE. If I had not been so quick to accept what I believed to be an Independent Assessment (even though I had the Parking Ticket as proof) I would not have paid the fine and let them take me to court where they almost certainly would fail to enforce a conviction.

I can't believe that there are people getting paid to be doing this. Don't ever waste your time going to them. This fake service need to be taken down.

Total scum bags don't waste your time
Useless !
Wouldn't surprise me if they where on commission

Absolutely rubbish!!!!! Our baby had an emergency allergy attack and we had to park along the road in our own residence area for 20 mins (maximum is 15 minutes). We got a ticket for this and they don't even consider our medical situation!!! It was a two-year-old life at risk and we got fined for this! Such biased service!

Not sure what imput theias had in this but one of our vans was parked in a access road and got a fake ticket (Privacy Notice) I was reading about a legal case where the Judge told the person to complain to DVLA as they aparantly have outlawed "Fake Parking Tickets" within days of making the complaing theias came back and said the paking company will be taking no further action.

Rubbish decision by IAS. I am a private hire taxi driver and provided all proofs for the reason to stay at the front door to pick up a patient who got late for some reason. Customer also provided to clarify the situation but never considered a single proof provided even there was no time limit for visitors but nothing was considered from my end and simply dismissed my appeal by saying they are satisfied that parking operator has enough proof. that is totally injustice as none of my proof was considered. no point to appeal as IAS will always support parking operators as they are members of them

Barrister stated in the appeal response that the site was well signposted . UKCS had submitted loads of pictures of signage nowhere near where I had stopped (for 1 minute 9 seconds!). I turned a few yards into a side street with no warning signs at the entrance and was nowhere near and did not pass the signs submitted. The barrister clearly hadn’t bothered to work out exactly where I had stopped. Not impressed! But, have given up and paid the extortion of £100 just to avoid being bullied by UKCPS.

Not independent at all, very biased and always favour parking company, parking company is their members or customers, so they always make decisions favour them, no point, they both are absolutely skunks.

I had to leave a reluctant star as I believe this organisation is a sham. I provided evidence of dining in the neighbouring restaurant and they had no evidence of me parking in their bays, just of me entering and exiting the SHARED enter and exit points. The IAS said I had no evidence - I want to find a way to report them to a watchdog. I will take this to court as I refuse to pay despicable people.

After having my initial appeal rejected by the operator, I decided to contact the IAS to contest my parking fine. I provided comprehensive evidence and a detailed explanation outlining the reasons behind my appeal. Unfortunately, I received a disappointing outcome as they dismissed my appeal, despite their reasons being factually incorrect and contradicted by the evidence presented. It was evident that they favored the ticketing company, making it apparent that appealing with them would be a futile effort.

Never been so disgusted in a company before. Absolutely disgusting people. Fined us £300 for parking in a bay that we had written permission to park in by the owner of that parking space. They also fined the owners carer for parking in this bay who also is his relative. Dont bother ever trying to appeal a charge with IAS. Because they'll will tell you they sympathise with you but also side with them. Corrupt people. So disgusting. Its so hard paying for bills as it is with the living crisis. We can just about afford to live and they still demanded £300. The parking attended laughed at the carer when he explained why he was there. Its so despicable. Ive never been so angry. They didnt care. They didnt want to help us. They didnt even care that we had good reason to park there. I hold myself to higher standard and usually would not let anyone get to me as these 2 companies have been parking and property management and ias. However the behaviour they have displayed shows they don't care for circumstance as long as they get your money. I despise anyone who behaves that way. Its just so wrong! Have the £300. While you take that just think about how much we are now out of pocket and struggling even more than we were before. So thank you parking and property management for taking money from people who are already struggling and thank you ias for assisting in this. Im sure you'll spend it wisely.

Absolutely, they are scammers, not professional at all, Dodgy people work there

In cahoots with the parking companies.

Crooks of the highest order

This company is shocking and obviously in cahoots with the parking companies! Fined 100 and appealed to ias as there machine was not fit for purpose and I had proof of attempted payment and proof I had money on my account still appeal dismissed! Robbing scamming pigs!

Not an independent process at all, sufficient evidence was provided yet they voted in favour of the parking firm which leads one to believe they are in cahoots with each other. I have used POPLA before which WAS independent. The lead adjudicator is Bryn Holloway. I will make the necessary investigations into this service and have them prosecuted if warranted.