General & Medical  Anmeldelser 

Once I achieved contact with the renewals team, the service was very good but it took 4 phone calls and 2 emails before the issue of renewal was resolved.

first you have to submit a claim via the website
you then wait , make calls told it takes 5 working days to process the claim after 10 working days and further calls now being told their underwriters are very busy.I AM NOT INTERESTED IN YOUR ISSUES , just proves its a insurance business and not a company who deal with health care.
please do not reply with our standard contact the 0800 number total waste of my time

Really great support in understanding the different levels of medical cover..

Called G&M to make a claim, the person on the phone was no help whatsoever and I still needed to do everything online. You submit documents like the referral letter, but cannot verify anywhere if they went through, nor an acknowledgement email is sent either. Their website is stuck in the 80s, you go in circles trying to get basic stuff done.

It took several days to get back to me on my claim, when any other insurer would process it over the phone and give you an answer. And now G&M are using more delaying tactics to avoid processing my claim, asking me to fill out paper forms to get medical history released before allowing my son to see a paediatrician, as per the referral. In the meantime, he carries on with the persistent symptoms and no care. I couldn't recommend G&M any less. This is in fact the worst health insurance I ever had to deal with.

Everything about this company is slow,
To getting approvals for claims, to the their terrible customer service. Damian takes forever to reply to calls and emails, it's a one of the worst insurance companies to deal with.

The only thing they are quick on, is increasing the premium each year, by a riduclous amount too.

Generally I am really satisfied . My questions are always answered and the team are knowledgable and very professional. I just wish it was a little quicker to get an authorisation . Sometimes it can be incredibly quick and other times it’s takes too long especially if you really need to see a consultant or have some physio or osteo. The private GP access is fantastic. Almost instant.
The website is easy to use, emails are dealt with quickly and there is always a copy of the letter posted as well as accessing it online. In fact the posted letter may not even be necessary because you can print it off or download it yourself without extra paper waste

Sanum in Customer Relations processed 2 claims recently over Christmas despite dealing with underwriters and therefore G&M gave me a speedy and effective service at a worrying time.

Very pleasant and easy to understand .

Appreciated the help and assistance from Joanne. Very clear, patient and above all, kind and helpful. Their customer help do the job. Thanks!

Friendly and helpful staff, clearly UK based. Not the corporate feel that you can get with lots of companies. Happy to talk through alternative options.

Really disappointed and angry at the experience I am having with G&M.
I have been with them for a couple of years, and although they are extremely slow in refunds ( when I have had to pay upfront and claim back), they have, until recently been ok to use.
I am still waiting for a refund for an appointment for my Son since October! I have sent receipts and invoices, made calls and been assured that it is being dealt with which it never is, sent numerous emails and the last 4 or 5 phone calls and emails have blatantly been ignored. This is what I pay for? Absolutely awful customer service. In one of the email responses there persons who had emailed me couldn’t even spell properly.
I am now having to take more of my time to send an official complaint ( which you can only do by post?!, who does that these days?), and then if no response which I am
Expecting I will have to take it even further by contacting the financial Ombudsman. Why can’t companies just do what they are supposed to do?

Simple process, documents sent quickly, sales/customer service staff gave their contact details and names rather than hiding behind a corporate cloak. One error I made on start date was quickly sorted out without fuss.

I spent a lot of time, emotional energy and some money responding to a stream of requests for information after filing a claim with G & M earlier this year. The subsequent process was slow and unhelpful - it felt like the claim was delayed on any pretext. For instance, I was told that the data from my GP's records, provided by an independent body as requested by G & M, was unacceptable (that decision was reversed but only after protest).

My claim was eventually declined, and I asked why. Part of the evidence cited by G & M was a side comment I made to a physiotherapist in February 2026 that "I had difficulty putting my socks on". True, but not relevant to the decision and probably more reflective of G & M's mindset. I was also told I could re-apply 10 months after the policy started.

I did so and went through another drawn out process, which eventually ended with a second letter saying that the claim had been turned down, but for a different reason from the first time around. I had wasted more than six months, and been pulled from pillar to post along the way. It was no comfort to learn that I could re-apply in two years time.

I filed a formal complaint, not challenging why the claim was declined, but the delay in doing so. G & M could have given me that decision and its rationale up front with the first claim. If so, I would have had my operation at the beginning not the end of 2025. Either way I would have paid for it, but I would have improved my quality of life much sooner if G & M had been quicker and more professional.

Given the way that the claim was handled by G & M, I suppose it's unsurprising not only that my complaint was not accepted but also that it was done in an unsympathetic and bureaucratic manner. I am now considering a complaint to the Ombudsman, something that I believe the insurance broker involved has already made.

Appreciated the call from Ethan. He was helpful, clear and very pleasant to speak to.

Query efficiently and pleasantly dealt with. Very helpful

I cant believe what others are saying about this health insurance provider. I will tell you from my firsthand experience that you should 100% look elsewhere.

This company plays on their delay tactic in their claim process, ask loads of questions and their policy allows them to take 5 working days to process any new messages, even on a single subject matter. Then they finally ask another big question for your gp to send your medical records for last two years over to them. If medical record history is needed why cant you be upfront about it? At least i do not have to wait another week just to find out this is required as part of your application process?! Don't waste your money on them, NHS may be a quicker solution. Absolutely disappointed. Why pay extra for a service that will cost you stress and burden?

Its been two weeks and my application had no major breakthrough progress.

In the contrary, my complaint email only took them half a day to respond. Length of that response is 3 times longer than the email about my claims application. (This lengthy email explained how they are not at fault just to be clear. )

My claim handler is Sanum.

Since inception of my policy of insurance covering my wife and myself, two claims have been made, one on behalf of myself and one on behalf of my wife

My wife’s claim was for outpatient treatment for injury to her knee. She was recommended treatment by steroid injection into her knee joint. The procedure was carried out at the Mayo outpatient clinic in London. G&M failed to pay the clinic invoice for three months - although authorised - resulting in threatened issue of proceedings against my wife. The explanation ultimately provided was that there was ‘an administrative error’ in the accounts department. Such was the level of stress occasioned by the default my wife elected not to have the recommended second injection deciding that the physical pain was preferable to pursuing a second claim.

The second claim was made by me. In 2017 I was treated for metastatic cancer in my liver and required a liver re-section. This was undertaken under the auspices of medical insurance provided as part of my remuneration with my former employers.

In early 2025 I was diagnosed with 4 incisional hernias at the site of the previous procedure. I submitted a claim to G&M who declined the claim without medical evidence determining that the claim was made for aesthetic or cosmetic reasons.

As a 68 year old man I don’t habitually take my shirt off in public and I wouldn’t submit myself to surgery unnecessarily. My broker appealed the decision and I was authorised to instruct a surgeon to assess the position. I was advised that repair was both essential and urgent. That G&M declined to pay the full invoice of the consultant is immaterial, however before authorizing the necessary surgery they insisted that I disclose my medical records from 2008 which as nine years before the surgery and 17 years before the claim was made The repair required is totally exclusive of the underlying cancer which was the reason for the original operation. It is merely a repair to the incisional scar. G&M have indicated that because my original claim was declined on the basis of its assessment that it was a cosmetic or aesthetic repair underwriters are entitled to demand access to my full medical records.

I have disclosed eight years of records in the possession of my GP but am told that any old records before 2017 will take up to three months to be produced. I have been told I should have the repair surgery as a matter of urgency and that I should not wait for three months and then such time as
G&M take to consider my records and presumably seek further justification for declining the claim.

I have paid a combined premium of some £800 a month since subscribing to the policy which premium has been accepted without demur and G& M have satisfied itself on inception that my wife and I were eligible for cover. That they should now seek to avoid cover is in my view fraudulent and deceitful

I have been advised by my broker that I should not terminate my policy but proceed to have the surgery on a self funded basis and seek to recover the cost retrospectively from G&M hoveever given the potential delay in obtaining my records and the time it will take for G&M to assess my claim the potential cost of premiums will be half the cost of the surgery on a self funded basis and that will not be reimbursed. It makes no commercial sense to pay further premiums when based on my experience to date there is limited chance that G&M will honour its contractual obligations.

Regrettably my experience has served only to confirm that this company is interested only in obtaining premiums and moves heaven and earth to justify declining cover.

I have been advised independently that G&M’s reputation is abysmal and I post this review by way of warning to others not to waste their money with what is ostensibly a bunch of cowboys

I had the insurance with G&M for a while, when I put in a claim for the first and only time. It got refused despite the policy indicating the kind of emergency procedure I had had was covered. Wording used in the policy was generic; however I was told that the specific sub-category of the procedure was not covered - although there was no mention of precise criteria in the policy, and my requests for clarification via email were ignored. When I called an advisor on the phone, they could not tell me either why my claim was rejected and what specific category the procedure had to be to meet the criteria - the advisor said he ‘did not know.’
I felt misled by the policy and that the general approach of the company was to refuse to settle claims on some retrospective arbitrary grounds not mentioned in the documents. Ultimately it took several months to receive a letter with an explanation of how my claim was assessed.
While trying to get a clarification on my case, my policy came up for a renewal which I decided against. Despite emailing the G&M to advise I didn’t wish to renew, payment was taken from my account. I had then to contact them asking for a refund and was promised it would be processed which didn’t happen - a further email chasing this was simply ignored, so I had to go via my bank.
My overall experience was that of poor customer service and misleading practices.