360 Wiki Writers Anmeldelser 29

TrustScore 3.5 av 5

3,3

Vi bekrefter ikke spesifikke uttalelser siden en forfatters mening er hens egen, men vi kan merke en anmeldelse som "bekreftet" når vi kan bekrefte at det har vært kontakt med virksomheten. Mer informasjon

For å beskytte plattformens integritet vil alle anmeldelser på plattformen—bekreftet eller ikke—bli undersøkt av vår automatiserte programvare (tilgjengelig hele døgnet). Denne teknologien er designet til å identifisere og fjerne innhold som bryter med retningslinjene våre, deriblant anmeldelser som ikke er basert på en faktisk erfaring. Vi vet at vi ikke kan fange opp alt. Hvis du tror at vi har gått glipp av noe, kan du rapportere det. Mer informasjon

Se hva andre synes

Vurdert til 5 av 5 stjerner

We collaborated with Wiki writers for a year and we finally have our Wikipedia page ready. 3 relationship managers were assigned to us but Krista stood out and did the work for us at the end. The a... Vis mer

Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

pague para que crearan mi pagína de wikipedia. parecian tener todo claro, incluso en la pagina de pago explicaban los pasos. dos meses despues no responden mis correos, dinero tirado a la basura

Vurdert til 5 av 5 stjerner

Derek was a great help with my Wikipedia page. He’s professional reliable and really knows the ropes. Made the whole process super easy even with Wikipedia's strict rules. Would definitely recommend.

Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

I am a doctor, a husband, and the father of two children. I thought I was mature and educated enough not to be manipulated in life—deceived to such an extent that it cost my children and me our live... Vis mer

Informasjon om virksomheten

Skrevet av virksomheten

We are a team of qualified professionals that help eligible individuals and companies to create their Wikipedia page.


Kontaktopplysninger

3,3

Middels

TrustScore 3.5 av 5

29 anmeldelser

5 stjerner
4 stjerner
3 stjerner
2 stjerner
1 stjerne

Ber kundene om å skrive anmeldelser

Denne virksomheten oppfordrer kundene til å skrive anmeldelser, enten positive eller negative

Har ikke svart på negative anmeldelser

Slik bruker virksomheten Trustpilot

Se hvordan anmeldelsene og vurderingene deres innhentes, vurderes og modereres.

Virksomhetene kan ikke betale for å skjule eller tilby belønning for anmeldelser på Trustpilot. Anmeldelser er meningene til individuelle brukere og ikke Trustpilot. Mer informasjon

Vurdert til 5 av 5 stjerner

Wikipedia Page is Live

We collaborated with Wiki writers for a year and we finally have our Wikipedia page ready. 3 relationship managers were assigned to us but Krista stood out and did the work for us at the end.

The agency thinks about compliance and credibility, which is good and we are happy that we were able to create our company page on Wikipedia.

24. desember 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

un engaño absoluto

pague para que crearan mi pagína de wikipedia.
parecian tener todo claro, incluso en la pagina de pago explicaban los pasos.
dos meses despues no responden mis correos,
dinero tirado a la basura

9. april 2026
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE I MADE.

I am a doctor, a husband, and the father of two children. I thought I was mature and educated enough not to be manipulated in life—deceived to such an extent that it cost my children and me our livelihood. I will never forgive myself for trusting sweet-talking liars.

Dear friends, acquaintances, and strangers, I make my most sincere appeal to you: DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE I MADE. Do not fall for people from this so-called company. I will not mention their names, not even by initials, in order to protect their legally guaranteed right to privacy. But please, if you have questions about how they manipulate people and would like to hear my story, write a comment in reply.

1. desember 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

This is a scam organization

This is a scam organization — please, do not engage with them.

Like others have already described, they first “review” your sources and confirm that everything is fine, only to change their story after you’ve made payment and been passed on to their so-called editor. Then they suddenly claim your sources are “not credible” and “won’t be accepted by Wikipedia.”

Their next move? They try to upsell you — offering to “create new content” or “find better sources” for more money. If you refuse and ask for a refund, they start threatening you with legal action and even claim they’ll report you to Wikipedia for hiring them.

Absolute crooks. I usually trust my gut and spot this kind of thing, but not this time. The biggest red flag, in hindsight, was that they immediately agreed to the low fee I proposed at the start — real professionals never do that.

13. november 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

Almost got scammed

Almost got scammed - caught it at the last moment.

Spoke to Derek Andrews via chat on their website. He jumped in after 5 mins of browsing which I thought was great because I like to do things quickly.

FIRST RED FLAG: Noticed some content on their website was still in Latin - like placeholder from a design that was not replaced. Didn't think much of it - it's an easy mistake to make.

After a good hour conversation, I asked him to send me the info and pricing we discussed in an email.

SECOND RED FLAG: Email did not get through - not even to junk. He jiggled something and then finally got one through to junk.

Didn't think much of it, email has problems all the time. Got the email, read through it and it looked good. I replied with a smaller project and amount to start.

THIRD RED FLAG: He called me 'Assad' in the email - my last name. Typical Indian thing - for some reason, Indian people always call me by my last name.

I still didn't clue in. I'm VERY distracted today and just trying to get some stuff done.

FOURTH AND CLINCHING RED FLAG: He sent the invoice to start the project - not for a deposit, but for the full amount. The URL used for payment was pcamp.io - never heard of it. Checked with Grok and Co-pilot, and sure enough, it's flagged.

I was so close to losing $2,000. I'm usually very astute when it comes to scams, but man they are getting sophisticated. The only way I even found these guys was from a Copilot (chatGPT) search.

Be careful out there folks.

10. november 2025
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

Happy to take your money and you get nothing!

Amount of contact before paying them: texts while at work, phone calls all the time including at work, spam emails asking when am I going to pay.

Amount of contact after paying them: absolutely none-have to fight to get them to reply and takes serious delays.

I first gave them ALL the information I had and told them what they wanted. They said fine. After paying them a ton of money (at least for me) I heard nothing from them for months despite reaching out. The only thing I received from them was spam email asking me to sign up with them? Super fun. After about three months finally responded. They then charged me more for images-like a lot more and stupidly I paid for it. After many more months they reached out and said, your project is going to fail, Wikipedia has stringent guidelines and you don't meet them and by the way do you have X Y, or Z? No. No I do not have those things, as I said before paying I gave you everything I had. So. I dumped a couple of years worth of advertising budget to get nothing. I have not heard back for over a month and am now resigned for getting nothing for a ton of hard earned money! You can pay a fraction of this and have someone honest on UpWork tell you before you pay not to do it (I checked).

19. mai 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

NOW JOINED FORCES WITH COMPLETE SCAMMERS AND CROOKS - BEWARE!

AS A RESULT OF BEING SCAMMED BY GLOBALWIKIEXPERTS, WHO ARE NOW PART OF 360 WIKI WRITERS, IT'S IMPORTANT TO READ THIS REVIEW FOR 360 ABOUT THEIR JOINING FORCES WITH THE CROOKS WHO STOLE MY MONEY AS THEY NOW COULD VERY WELL STEAL YOURS:

GLOBAL WIKI EXPERTS REVIEW:

$749 poorer, 7 months later, with zero results and a whole lotta excuses before everyone in the sting operation went AWOL.

These scammers are clearly not experts at anything but taking your money and running away with it.

Naming and shaming the criminals: ADAM HUDSON, the guy who was handed the mission of getting a Wiki presence up and running IN FEBRUARY, who subsequently disappeared for the last 3 months only to reappear a few days ago after my negative review - only to disappear yet again after more lame almost-excuses, with no attempt at making things right; MATTHEW, the "Team Manager" without a last name or telephone number (I should have seen that one coming!) who, rather than taking control of the situation (that is, actually managing it) clearly ditched the whole mission once my money was in their bank account; and WILLY TURNER who invoiced me for services never-rendered, who with the other two should be behind bars.

Not a single person with basic knowledge and whose actual job it is to get a wiki page up and running (for a fee!) would have found getting my page up on Wikipedia even remotely challenging. After all it's not like I'm an unknown entity in my field - but it's clear they had no desire to get a page up in the first place, being the crooks that they are.

Apparently they have joined forces with 360 Wiki Writers - so a caution to anyone also considering using 360 Wiki. Whether they know it or not, 360 Wiki Writers are now operating with the creeps of GlobalWiki in their ranks, so are either unaware of the criminality of their new partners or encouraging it, and can't be trusted.

Global Wiki Experts have not only cost me my hard earned money, but time I will never get back and potential investors I was hoping would tap into my Wiki page to see the breadth and scope of what I do. I'm left absolutely disgusted by this whole wasted journey and am about to instigate legal action.

21. august 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

Warning

Warning. This company mislead me every step of the way, from beginning to end. When I initially spoke to a representative,I was told that I needed to pay a required $500.00 before they could give me any details. After paying the amount requested I was asked to send them any references that I had. I sent what documents I had and was told that they were not sufficient. I then said to the representative that if my documents were not sufficient, and you weren't able to get me a wikipedia page, then I wish you had explained that to me before I paid for your services. I was immediately told that they could still get the page. Long story short, I was shuffled to three different representatives before finally being told to check back in four months because it takes that amount of time for the page to get approved. This was in June of 2024. I checked back in December of that same year only to be told that the previous representatives were no longer handling my page. I was given a forth representative who explained to me that I needed to purchase eight references and that these references would guarantee me a wiki page. They further stated that it would not take another four months, even stating that it should be done before Christmas. I paid an additional $1,100.00 for articles that were supposed to guarantee to me the page. Another few months went by and I received an email congratulating me on my wikipedia page. I used the link in the email only to find that the page had been removed to a draft stage, and not available. After informing the rep about the status of the page, I was told the fact that my page was made live, and
their obligation to me was completed. I then contacted a supervisor/ owner of said company, who informed me that technically and legally the rep was right. even though the page did not stay live more than a few hours. His exact words to me is that I was misled, and that the representative who misled me had also misled seven other clients,
further stated that, that particular rep was fired. He went on to say that if I purchased two additional references for $1,500.00 he could get the page back live again. I explained to him that, if I
had known about this process and their requirements in the beginning, I never would have spent one dime on their service. I refused to pay more and was told that I could not get a refund on the $1,600.00 that I had already paid. I then said that if 360 wikiwriters would pay for the additional references and the page stayed live, I would then reimburse them the $1,500.00. Of course they refused
afterall, why would they trust me. Basically, this company admitted to me that I was misled by their own representatives, but refused to be responsible for their deceptive actions and make me whole again. I have text messages and documents to back-up my review. They also record the calls so they too can further validate my review. They use the word misled, but to me, who has spent $1,600.00 for references that I neither want nor need, in my opinion this was a scam. I will not stop with just writing this review. I hope others will be warned about the malpractices of this company.

5. april 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 5 av 5 stjerner

I mostly worried about creating a…

I mostly worried about creating a Wikipedia page that would not be flagged or deleted. 360 Wiki Writers took care everything proper research and scrupulous adherence to Wikipedia's seemingly ironclad rules. My page was approved smoothly and is live. If you want your wiki page to be written and approved professionally, then they know exactly what to do!

24. mars 2025
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

Beware of 360WikiWriters – A TOTAL SCAM!

I had a terrible experience with 360WikiWriters. They initially convinced me to purchase a package of PRs, claiming it was necessary to establish notability for my Wikipedia page. After I paid, they suddenly told me I needed even more PRs to support the content—something they never mentioned upfront.
To pressure me into paying more, they sent a screenshot of my page being declined by Wikipedia, making it seem like an external issue. But in reality, they were the ones taking it down themselves to manipulate me into spending more money! It’s a complete scam and extortion tactic.
Stay away from 360WikiWriters unless you want to be deceived, overcharged, and left with nothing in return.

1. mars 2025
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 1 av 5 stjerner

SCAM, be aware

I wish I could give zero stars. My experience with 360WikiWriters was nothing short of disappointing. They advertise themselves as professional Wikipedia writers, but in reality, they take your money and provide subpar, plagiarized content that gets rejected instantly. This is a real scam.

At first, we trusted their process and even followed their recommendation to purchase press releases (PRs) to support the Wikipedia page. However, when their poorly written submission was rejected, instead of fixing their work, they insisted we needed even more PRs—turning it into an endless cycle of additional payments with no tangible results.

And before they attempt to dismiss this review as fake (which seems to be a common tactic of theirs), we have ample evidence—emails, payment records, and chat logs—that clearly expose their deceptive practices. If you’re thinking about using their services, do yourself a favor and look elsewhere for a reputable company.

8. september 2024
Anmeldelse skrevet uten oppfordring
Vurdert til 5 av 5 stjerner

The 360 Wiki Writers did a fantastic…

The 360 Wiki Writers did a fantastic job at creating a very professional and research-based Wikipedia page for my brand. Their team was well-aware of the results and policies Wikipedia has, thus providing content hat was neutral, verifiable, and met all standards of notability. They made sure to really research and build accurate citations using credible sources wile presenting that data in a very structured nd interesting manner. The team was responsive to my queries and kept me updated on all the steps that they were taking.

23. oktober 2024

Dette er Trustpilot

Alle kan gi tilbakemelding på Trustpilot. De som skriver en anmeldelse, har rett til når som helst å redigere og slette den. Enhver publiserte anmeldelse er synlig så lenge en tilknyttet konto er aktiv.

Virksomhetene kan automatisk be kundene om anmeldelser, og disse blir bekreftet som faktiske opplevelser.

Lær mer om andre slags anmeldelser.

Vi har et eget team og smart teknologi som beskytter plattformen vår. Finn ut hvordan vi motvirker falske anmeldelser.

Lær om anmeldelsesprosessen på Trustpilot.

Her får du åtte tips om hvordan du skriver en god anmeldelse.

Verifisering kan bidra til å sørge for at anmeldelsene du leser på Trustpilot, er skrevet av faktiske personer.

Det kan gi en skjev TrustScore å tilby belønning for eller be bare enkelte kunder om å skrive en anmeldelse, og dette går imot retningslinjene våre.

Ta en titt selv