I took out a trial of New Scientist but decided it was not worth the subscription cost. When I tried to cancel, I found the process less than straightforward. If you are considering a trial, I reco... Vis mer
Selskapet har svart
Vi bekrefter ikke spesifikke uttalelser siden en forfatters mening er hens egen, men vi kan merke en anmeldelse som "bekreftet" når vi kan bekrefte at det har vært kontakt med virksomheten. Mer informasjon
For å beskytte plattformens integritet vil alle anmeldelser på plattformen—bekreftet eller ikke—bli undersøkt av vår automatiserte programvare (tilgjengelig hele døgnet). Denne teknologien er designet til å identifisere og fjerne innhold som bryter med retningslinjene våre, deriblant anmeldelser som ikke er basert på en faktisk erfaring. Vi vet at vi ikke kan fange opp alt. Hvis du tror at vi har gått glipp av noe, kan du rapportere det. Mer informasjon
I took out a trial of New Scientist but decided it was not worth the subscription cost. When I tried to cancel, I found the process less than straightforward. If you are considering a trial, I reco... Vis mer
Selskapet har svart
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the... Vis mer
Selskapet har svart
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said probl... Vis mer
Selskapet har svart
You start a trial with the intention of giving the product a go. You set up a reminder on your calendar to either cancel or continue with subscription. They process the renewal charge more than one... Vis mer
Selskapet har svart
Science news and science articles from New Scientist
2 Derry Street, W8 5TT, London, Storbritannia
Ingen tidligere historie av å be om anmeldelser
Denne virksomheten har ikke oppfordret kundene i det siste, og anmeldelser er derfor kanskje ikke representative
Har svart på 100 % av de negative anmeldelsene sine
Svarer vanligvis i løpet av én uke
Slik bruker virksomheten Trustpilot
Se hvordan anmeldelsene og vurderingene deres innhentes, vurderes og modereres.
Seems to have forgotten what science is, and just publishes PC/Woke slanted articles, never missing an opportunity the make a dig at Brexit supporters, Trump supports or Trump himself. The articles make wild assertions and have the tone that these are facts rather than a single researchers opinion.
When I first started reading the New Scientist it used to take me several hours to read it, now around 15 mins as I ignore the wokery. It's gone downhill very much faster since the new editor took over, with silly projects best suited for a pre-teen magazine.
I'm glad I read it via the library RB-Digital service and don't have to pay...

Svar fra New Scientist
Fantastic offer for new customers. It would be rude not to subscribe!

Svar fra New Scientist
I started reading New Scientist in 1979 when it was 35p. It is now £5.95. To reflect the reduction of the value of money since 1979 it should be priced around £1.75. Notwithstanding subscription discounts, I am not sure that the quality has increased enough to justify the current price.

Svar fra New Scientist
Nice to have a source of the latest theory’s about all the things that nobody understands.

Svar fra New Scientist
Very enjoyable magazine... I've read it for years, so £10 for 10 weeks seems extraordinary, though I'm guessing this is a one off which will change after 10 weeks so I will need to see if the cost after that is affordable. I hope so.

Svar fra New Scientist
Great to have this online now often bought paper version. Good to have lqtest science news that you can rely on without any political slant

Svar fra New Scientist
I recently resubscribed after a few years’ gap and was looking forward to reconnecting with my regular trustworthy and entertaining science fix. What a disappointment - what has happened to this magazine? The science news is thin, the features often unauthoritative, the comment often specious, and the humour neither sharp nor funny. On top of that, every issue features a reprinted feature from an old edition (which i could presumably read a back number on the app if i wished) and another feature excerpted from a New Scientist book. It’s sad to see such a wonderful publication reduced to this.

Svar fra New Scientist
I placed an order for a subscription by mistake. I then emailed AND called to exercise my right of cancellation for a refund within 14 days. On the phone, I was told that they had to escalate it and I would receive an email regarding the refund however I have not received anything. After multiple emails and phone calls, it seems very difficult to get anything done with this company.
UPDATE
Finally received refund today so I am happy with the conclusion.

Svar fra New Scientist
Consistently excellent content
I always enjoy reading the magazine, due to the breadth and quality of the information. Access to the archive on the website is also very useful.

Svar fra New Scientist
I wish to purchase the recently published New Scientist book 'The nature of reality'. I have made several attempts to contact them about this but to no avail. Why on earth don't they have a customer-service e-mail address?

Svar fra New Scientist
I am so disappointed. I loved your magazine but i am very angry since I've read an article of Graham Lawton about misleading science (may 6th 2020) with hydroxychloroquine as lonely exemple. Now I'm asking : Is NS impartial ? Can I believe it ?
Other subject : 4 weeks to receive the magazine is too long. So I think I'll quit at the end of my annual subscription.
With regrets

Svar fra New Scientist
A great bench mark in a world of theatrical statistics and political spin -well done to you all! 👍👷

Svar fra New Scientist
I read every issue, cover to cover, except the physics news which is beyond me. New Scientist is always thought provoking and I enjoy being part of the community of readers.

Svar fra New Scientist
I thought I'd ordered the print version+ app, but have received none since renewal.
I cannot get the information telling me whether you have stopped printing it or not. I'd much prefer it to the app.

Svar fra New Scientist
The videos are constantly buffering, have been horribly organised (there is no search function) and best of all are often recorded in loud malls with echoing background noise. Seriously, what are you thinking?

Svar fra New Scientist
After 20 years I decided to stop my subscription. The scientific content isn’t of high quality anymore, it makes boring reading, and I already read most of it free from various newsletters. Sad.

Svar fra New Scientist
I attempted to buy a subscription to New Scientist as a gift for my father. I used the gift subscription option on their website, which instantly diverted me to their standard subscription signup page. This was a bit of a red flag because a typical gift subscription page would usually allow you to enter your own details alongside those of the recipient.
That wasn't possible, so I entered my own details for billing purposes, assuming that I'd be able to activate the subscription on a different email address.
I was right. You can activate the subscription on another email address, but a couple of days after my father did this, the account was blocked. The New Scientist staff advised they'd blocked the account because they couldn't link it to a subscription. Sigh. Over the next six weeks, my father and I emailed back and forth with the New Scientist trying to explain the issue to them and get it fixed.
As I see it, this was clearly caused by a concerning flaw in their processes, but at no point did I feel like the customer service team really comprehended this. Actually, they weren't willing to address or respond to any of my questions or queries. It seemed a little like I was emailing an automated system. After 6 weeks, we were informed that the issue was resolved. However, my father still cannot log in or activate the account.
He received a physical copy of New Scientist in the post though - which is odd because I only purchased a digital subscription! Given that six weeks were wasted, I asked if the subscription could be restarted, but I never received a response as to whether this had happened or not. I don't have the will to spend half my life trying to fully resolve this, so I guess my poor old man will just have to make do with whatever comes through the post.
This is the most appalling customer service experience I've ever had. I don't typically write reviews but I felt incensed enough by this fiasco to do so. Reading some of the other reviews here, I'm now concerned the next battle will come when they bill me for a renewal without my knowledge or consent. I will never touch this magazine again and would implore anyone reading this to avoid wasting your time, energy and finances.

Svar fra New Scientist
The quality of the articles has gone way down in the past year or so and now the cost of my annual subscription has gone up by 20% (whilst UK inflation is currently 0.8%). Time to cancel and look elsewhere I think!

Svar fra New Scientist
Really awful magazine should not contain the word scientist in their name
Based on unconfirmed, untested, incomplete information that is dangerous and misleading, disregarding and damaging to human rights advocates

Svar fra New Scientist
Alle kan gi tilbakemelding på Trustpilot. De som skriver en anmeldelse, har rett til når som helst å redigere og slette den. Enhver publiserte anmeldelse er synlig så lenge en tilknyttet konto er aktiv.
Vi har et eget team og smart teknologi som beskytter plattformen vår. Finn ut hvordan vi motvirker falske anmeldelser.
Lær om anmeldelsesprosessen på Trustpilot.
Verifisering kan bidra til å sørge for at anmeldelsene du leser på Trustpilot, er skrevet av faktiske personer.
Det kan gi en skjev TrustScore å tilby belønning for eller be bare enkelte kunder om å skrive en anmeldelse, og dette går imot retningslinjene våre.