SubmitHub Anmeldelser 996

Their customer support is the best!

They have multiple services:

- Curated playlist submissions. I think for this you have to be really mindful on who do you send your song, listen to the playlists and check that your song is the right fit, otherwise you are just wasting money. So far I have no complains, it always worked within expectations.

- Meta Ads: This is a newer service where they run the ads for you on META and so far it's been working well for me. If you don't want to overcomplicate yourself it's a good option. Also I found that they are super good at replying and answering any questions you may have. It really looks like they care about your campaign and tweak things as the campaign is running to improve it.

So far really good, and any time I had to contact support they answered super quickly and they are very friendly.

I ran a Meta ad campaign with Submithub to build followers on a Spotify playlist. It went very very well. It was super simple to set up and they were really helpful and fast to respond to any questions I had. They also have some great tools for analysing the results. The best part was that the results were about 250% better than a very similar campaign I ran with one of their competitors. So good!

Only real trustworthy service for promoting music

Basically, I think SubmitHub is good, as long as there are real streams and reputable curators behind it. However, you pay a relatively large amount of money only to be rejected by many curators—even though the songs in their playlists are often of poorer quality. If one of my songs is added to a playlist in the future, I will adjust my experience and review accordingly. After all, I am also represented in the dance charts.

They are delivering a good service for small artists! Users have some possibilities to promote their music in different ways. Curators are being observed, which means you receive specific and helpful feedback if your track doesn't make a playlist.
I would recommend SubmitHub due to their tools, supportive methods, explanations, activity digests.

For my Global Artist VISA application, I needed written confirmation of all the radio shows my music had been featured on. Unfortunately, the chats with the radio hosts who had played my song had all been archived and I no longer could contact them. I submitted a support ticket, and in less than a day, someone had contacted me saying that they emailed the radio hosts asking for their business emails so that I could reach out personally. By the next day I had the emails I needed and everything was sorted :)

Very user-friendly! I always have a great experience using SubmitHub.

I actually watched the CEO/Founder on a masterclass provided by Symphonic. That was the first time I’ve ever seen a CEO from a platform like Submithub engage and share the values and purpose of their organization. So, I decided to give it a chance. It has only been a few days, but so far the platform does exactly what he shared during the masterclass. And the results are very promising. Submithub is a tool for artist to use to help grow their audience, not generate useless bot streams.

I’d recommend Submithub!!

I like SubmiHub for the opportunities to get reviewed and have my songs added to playlists with the hope of gaining new fans. The service is easy to use and seems to benefit the independent music community. However, I have not received a return on my SubmitHub investment, but that is due to low music streaming income and that my music is simply not super popular.

Waste of time and money. Most of the "curators" charge unreasonable submission fees and then reject the vast majority of tracks - usually for nitpicky reasons.

Update: adding more details because the company tried (unsuccessfully) to get my negative review deleted. Trying to bury my thoughts instead of addressing them leaves a bad taste.

As others have noted, curators give vague, confusing feedback that makes it seem like they don't even listen to the tracks. They only use the site to make as much money as possible. The same song can have feedback that ranges from "too polished" to "not polished enough." Sometimes it's "Great track, but I didn't like the hi-hat you used at 0:43 so I have to say no." Absurd, nitpicky excuses. Often they'll deny tracks and say things like "I loved it, but just not right for my playlist" when they have no real excuse. I listened to every playlist before submitting to know that I wasn't wasting time. I would still get rejections for songs that fit the vibe perfectly and were perfectly produced. SubmitHub is *more* expensive than similar sites, and yet the rejection rates seem significantly higher.

The site is full of "curators" who exploit the site as a second source of income. And the site runners seem happy to jump to their defense, even when its obvious that they are just taking advantage of artists, because they benefit financially as well. Maybe this is just the modern state of the music industry? Tons of bad actors out there taking advantage of hardworking musicians who are just trying to increase their reach and notoriety. Music is a business, after all.

Regardless, the reach of most playlists is negligible. You can easily blow $100 on this site just to get on a few playlists that generate a couple hundred streams, maybe. The ROI is negative, considering how little streaming pays.

In short, this is one of *many* sites out there that will take your money without providing anything meaningful in return. Better to just find other methods of getting your work out there.

Pretty good when it comes to getting a boost in engagement.

Wonderful platform to have your music discovered with fantastic playlists and blogs. The website is well organized and the support team is amazing! Highly recommended!

Submithub is an essential tool in the process of promoting our music.
They collaborate with a wide range of playlist curators and we’ve had success with playlist placements and further interest/plays/fans as a regular of that exposure. The website is simple and super functional, with really well thought out shortcuts. We’d highly recommend using submithub for new and upcoming artists to help in getting their music heard.

As an artist, I've been using Submithub for 3 years now and never had any trouble or even a suggestion, everything is perfect in my opinion, very friendly and easy to use, very recommendable.

SubmitHub is a great platform for getting your music heard and connecting with curators. The interface is smooth, and feedback can be really helpful when it’s thoughtful. That said, curators can be a bit of a hit or miss — some give great insights while others seem to skip through quickly. Overall though, it’s still a valuable tool for independent artists trying to grow their audience.

Honest, safe and a great boost for Spotify algo!
i can highly reccomend it.

SubmitHub is by far the best service I know for building real connections between artists and playlist curators. It’s transparent, reliable, and gives you access to genuine feedback that actually helps you grow. The team behind SubmitHub is incredibly friendly and always ready to help. I also love that it works for any budget, making it accessible to everyone. A trustworthy and professional platform that truly supports independent artists.

Considero que ha sido muy transparente cada proceso y la comunicación se hace muy fácil con los curadores. Se siente que es muy confiable y eso anima a seguir trabajando con la plataforma-.

SubmitHub sells a dream to independent artists and delivers nothing. The whole system is built to take money from musicians who just want a real chance to be heard. It’s not a discovery platform. It’s a hustle.
1. Contradictory Feedback That Means Nothing
One curator said my song was perfect but not dark enough. Another said it was perfect but too dark. That’s not feedback. That’s nonsense. It proves most curators aren’t actually listening with any care. They’re just moving through submissions fast to collect payments.
2. Recycled or AI-Generated Responses
The feedback is the same lines over and over. You can see identical sentences from different curators. It reads like it was generated or pulled from a template. SubmitHub will deny it and throw some PR explanation, but try it yourself and you’ll see. You’ll pay to read lines that could apply to any song ever made.
3. Playlists Are Mostly Dead
Most playlists on there have zero real engagement. Many have inflated follower counts but no active listeners. Getting on one does nothing for your numbers. Spotify’s own algorithmic playlists have taken over, and SubmitHub’s network has no real pull anymore.
4. The Business Model Is Insanity
You pay real money for someone to listen to one minute of your song and decide if “the mood fits.” Think about that. One minute. Then they click reject, write two meaningless sentences, and you lose your credit. You’re not paying for exposure or opportunity. You’re paying to be told “not the right mood” after 45 seconds of listening. It’s absurd.
5. It Benefits Everyone Except the Artist
Curators get paid whether they accept or reject you. SubmitHub gets a cut no matter what. The only one who loses is the artist the person actually creating something. It’s a setup that profits off musicians’ frustration and hope.
6. The Whole Thing Is Built on False Promises
SubmitHub hides behind terms like “honest feedback” and “guaranteed listen,” but that’s just marketing language. In reality, the “listen” is barely a minute, the “feedback” is generic, and the system produces almost no real exposure. The company will defend it with technicalities, but the outcome is always the same: artists spend, curators earn, and nothing changes.
7. Even the Ratings Look Fake
Look at their public ratings. Most of the recent positive ones read like scripted PR. You can spot the same tone, the same structure, the same vague “it helped me” language repeated again and again. It’s hard to believe those are real users when the experience of almost every serious artist says the opposite.