Resumejudge Anmeldelser 

The UI was really smooth and easy to use

I was returning to work after a 2-year career break, and I was scared that recruiters would reject me immediately.

My first resume tried to hide the gap, but it made everything more confusing. ResumeJudge helped me make the CV honest, structured, and much stronger. The scanner gave me a starting ATS score of 44/100. After optimizing it for project coordinator and admin operations roles, I got it to 86/100.

What I liked most was that the final CV did not feel fake or overdone. It helped me highlight my previous experience, transferable skills, freelance work, and the online certifications I completed during my break.

I used the paid subscription for one month and applied to 23 jobs. I got 8 responses, 5 interviews, and one offer that I accepted yesterday.

I was honestly close to giving up before this. ResumeJudge gave me confidence and a resume that actually represented me well.

Definitely a 5-star experience.

Great loved how they tookall my information and made it concise!

This made my resume that I already made look nice with good formatting and they have a bunch of templates. It also scanned my resume and suggested things to change or correct and gave me a rating.

Resume judge gives great insight on how to improve a resume

Not gonna lie, I didn’t expect a resume tool to make this much difference.

I had been applying for product roles for almost 4 months and the silence was brutal. Like, not even rejection emails. Just nothing. I thought maybe the market was bad or maybe I wasn’t good enough.

Then I tried ResumeJudge and scanned my resume. My ATS score was 51, which explained a lot. The tool pointed out that my resume was too vague, missing role-specific keywords, and not showing enough actual outcomes.

I bought the subscription and started using it properly. For every job, I would scan the JD, tweak my CV, and check the score before applying. Slowly, my resumes started scoring around 87–93.

The difference was crazy. Earlier I had maybe 2 replies out of 60 applications. After using ResumeJudge, I got 18 replies from 31 applications. One recruiter even said my resume made it very easy to understand what I had done.

I finally got an offer yesterday for an Associate Product Manager role. I was honestly so relieved I just sat there smiling for 10 minutes.

Huge thanks to ResumeJudge. This genuinely helped me turn things around.

I used ResumeJudge while applying for backend engineering roles, and it made a huge difference.

My old resume was too technical but not recruiter-friendly. It had project names, tech stacks, and responsibilities, but almost no business impact. The scanner showed that my ATS score was only 58, even though I had strong experience with Node.js, PostgreSQL, AWS, and distributed systems.

ResumeJudge helped me rewrite my CV so each bullet had impact: latency improvements, infra cost reduction, API performance, monitoring, and ownership. It also helped me tailor versions for “Backend Engineer,” “Platform Engineer,” and “Software Engineer II” roles.

I subscribed for 3 months and used it before almost every application. Before ResumeJudge, I had sent around 80 applications and got maybe 3 replies. After optimizing my resume, I applied to 52 roles and got 21 recruiter responses.

I got my final offer yesterday from a fintech company. The recruiter literally said my resume was “very clear and easy to evaluate.”
That alone made the subscription worth it.

Horrible product, very bad experience. Poor customer care, they didn't even refund my money. Won't recommend ResumeJudge to anyone.

So far so good. I do hate that it cannot auto correct and add the items to the time but other than that I have been getting interviews with my update resume reference.

Resum Judge solved my problem which other tools couldn't. From generating points to scanning it deeply for correct ATS scores. Thanks to the team behind it, I am getting better responses for my job applications!

I used Resume Judge to analyze my resume, and it was an eye-opener. I had a few errors that needed to be corrected, even after Claude.AI had analyzed it